Tracking the Lawsuit Surge: How Both Parties Are Preparing for Court

If you are tracking Tracking the Lawsuit Surge: How Both Parties Are Preparing for Court, we offer a clear overview you shouldn't miss.

The sharpest conflict revolves around local certification. In past decades, county certification of election results was a ministerial task, a non-discretionary clerical duty required by law. Today, that administrative assumption has collapsed.

In Georgia, the State Election Board sparked intense legal friction by passing rules authorizing individual county board members to conduct "reasonable inquiries" before certifying results, and mandating that county officials hand-count the physical number of ballots cast to reconcile totals. Democratic lawsuits, joined by several local election administrators, moved swiftly into Fulton County Superior Court to challenge these rules. Litigators argued that the administrative board exceeded its statutory authority and infringed on powers reserved exclusively for the state legislature.

The stakes extend far beyond administrative procedure. If a county board in a battleground jurisdiction refuses to certify its canvass by the statutory deadline, the entire state certification schedule faces chaos. Under the federal Electoral Count Reform Act (ECRA), states face strict deadlines to submit certified executive slates to Congress. By challenging board regulations months before November, litigators aim to secure binding state supreme court precedent confirming that local canvassers cannot hold certification hostage over fraud allegations.