Why Is the Triple Axel Still So Rare in Women’s Skating? Fact-Checking the Scoring & Science

Looking for details on Why Is the Triple Axel Still So Rare in Women’s Skating? Fact-Checking the Scoring & Science? Uncover expert perspectives in our full report.

Elite athletes rarely avoid a challenge purely because of physical difficulty; they avoid it when the mathematical risk outweighs the reward. Under the current ISU judging framework, the triple axel carries a base value of 8.00 points. By comparison, a clean double axel yields a base value of 3.30 points, while a standard triple Lutz carries 5.90 points.

The danger lies in how the base value and Grade of Execution (GOE) interact when things go wrong. If technical callers spot a jump missing more than a quarter revolution at landing, they slap the skater with an under-rotation penalty, designated on scorecards by a "<" symbol. That single call cuts the base value by 20% down to 6.40 points while triggering automatic negative GOE deductions from the judging panel. A downgraded jump ("<<") drops the element to double-axel base value with massive execution penalties, often netting fewer than 1.50 total points.

Consider the competitive choice facing a podium contender. Skaters who skip the triple axel and execute a flawless triple Lutz with high GOE routinely earn between 7.50 and 8.30 points. Attempting a triple axel that gets called under-rotated and results in a step-out typically yields 3.20 to 4.10 points. Skaters who gamble on the jump risk surrendering a four-point advantage on a single technical element, the exact margin separating an Olympic medal from fifth place.