Fact-Checking Danielle Smith: Can an Alberta Premier Legally Appoint Her Spouse as an Unofficial Policy Adviser?
In August 2024, an investigative investigation by The Tyee disclosed that David Moretta attended a closed-door meeting involving senior ministers, provincial bureaucrats, and external corporate proponents of a capital-intensive megaproject. Moretta held no cabinet appointment, had taken no oath of office, and drew no civil service salary. He attended neither as a credentialed technical specialist nor as a registered lobbyist.
His presence was not an isolated social drop-in. Bureaucrats present at the meeting noted that Moretta sat alongside Premier Smith, observing commercially sensitive exchanges that carried profound regulatory and budgetary implications for taxpayers. When pressed on the propriety of his attendance, Smith maintained that political spouses regularly offer unvarnished perspectives. She argued that matrimonial trust supersedes standard bureaucratic protocol.
Civil society advocates quickly pushed back. A spouse who sits in on technical policy meetings gains exposure to proprietary corporate filings, commercially sensitive forecasts, and privileged state data. Under the Westminster system, access to executive-level discussions is strictly paired with constitutional accountability. If Moretta holds no public office, the public has no statutory tool to hold him liable for the handling of that data.